MPs reject plans to change shotgun licensing rules

Contributions from across the chamber made clear that MPs had been inundated with correspondence ahead of the debate, with many directly citing the strength of views expressed by their constituents.

Julie Minns, Labour MP for Carlisle, said: “For many, this proposal represents a far-reaching regulatory shift with consequences that may not have yet been fully understood. The anxiety that’s been expressed to myself and other members is not rooted in resistance to safety.

“They want dangerous individuals to be prevented from accessing firearms. What they question is whether creating a larger, potentially more congested system, will achieve these outcomes. Or, whether it risks the opposite by overwhelming the very departments responsible for ensuring public safety, and taking away what are incredibly useful and effective pest control tools from farmers, landowners and pest control agents.

“Properly resourcing our police licensing teams, ensuring consistent national standards and rigorous application of the Home Office’s statutory guidance should be the priority.” 

Ben Lake, Plaid Cymru MP for Ceredigion Preseli, said: “The proposed changes, although perhaps well-intentioned, are disproportionate, and will not actually realise the stated objective the Government has for them.”

Dave Doogan, SNP MP for Angus and Perthshire Glens, said: “We are here because of the 121,000 signatures on that petition.

“Many of the highest constituency counts of those signatures are in Scotland where gun ownership per capita is much higher than it is elsewhere in these islands, for entirely predictable and understandable reasons. And in my constituency of Angus and Perthshire Glens, the highest respondent rate (of all of the United Kingdom) – 550 respondents against this proposal by government – has come from my constituency…

“…I think what people in here are objecting to, and many people out there are objecting to, is a vast increase in the bureaucratic burden, which will deliver no significant increase in public safety.”

Robbie Moore, Conservative MP for Keighley and Ilkley, said: “One hundred and twenty one thousand people have signed this petition, and I believe it has been one of the fastest signed petitions that the Petitions Committee has received for a long period of time. And I think we could all agree that it’s been a worthy debate to have.

“Most recently, at Ilkley Rugby Club, at an event that had been organised by BASC that I was kindly asked to speak at, many farmers, land managers, pest controllers, those participating in game shoots and clay pigeon shoots, turned up to express their level of concern about the government’s aspiration to merge section 2 and section one under the Firearms Act 1968. 

“I think it is widely recognised that firearms licensing is effective at protecting public safety.”

Sarah Dyke, Lib Dem MP for Glastonbury and Somerton, said: “Gun controls should only be strengthened when there is a clear necessity to protect public safety. We Liberal Democrats share concerns that any change to firearms licensing, including the reclassification of shotguns, must be evidence-based, and go hand in hand with appropriate support.

“The Liberal Democrats stand opposed to the Government’s proposal as the current evidence indicates that there is no need to merge Section 2 with Section 1 licences. Both already require rigorous and identical health and safety checks.

“However, the system must be sufficiently resourced, which currently, it is not. This policy poses a real risk to all the communities, both culturally and economically.”

MPs also recognised the importance of shooting to communities across the country, stressing that any changes to firearms licensing must be grounded in evidence and common sense.

BASC is sincerely grateful to the MPs who took the time to attend and speak up for responsible shooting. Their support in Parliament matters deeply to the hundreds of thousands of law-abiding certificate holders who expect and depend on a fair and workable licensing system.

We are equally grateful to our members and supporters who ensured their voices were heard in advance of the debate.