On this page you will find published white papers from BASC. The white papers offer evidence-based policy recommendations to enhance and maximise economic, environmental and social benefits provided by shooting.
Published: September 2015
This paper calls for the extension of shotgun and firearm certificate duration from five to ten years, on the basis that such a change will improve efficiency and effectiveness within the police service, and provide an enhanced service to certificate holders without impacting public safety.
Significant improvements in police licensing now allow 24/7/365 monitoring of certificate holders, meaning that risks remain low and stable over time.
The paper recommends a phased introduction method of ten year certificates, which would smooth the current ‘peaks’ and ‘troughs’ in police licensing department workloads. It would also reflect a move towards compliance with the governments stance on better regulation.
Published: March 2015
This white paper looks at the positive conservation and socioeconomic contributions produced by grouse shooting and their role in supporting and improving the delivery of upland ecosystem services.
It recommends support for the positive contribution grouse moor management makes to sustainably maintaining and improving upland ecosystem service provision, that stakeholders work together and engage in constructive dialogue, and that a joined-up approach be used by government, policymakers and public and private sectors to maximise benefits. It also warns of the dangers of unintended consequences to the balance of our moorland economies, ecosystems and communities from policy which is not evidence-based.
Published: July 2014
This white paper examines how the ecosystem services provided by habitats, and the species that use them, can be used to inform decisions for protected sites. Member States have an obligation to maintain healthy populations of species, but the exact level should also take account of cultural and recreational requirements.
The paper recommends that socioeconomic factors be addressed at the time of designation, and that ecosystem services be used as the most appropriate method for considering socioeconomic factors.