At BASC our arguments are backed by solid, scientific evidence and we refuse to countenance any decisions proposed by policy-makers, regulators or others that are not soundly evidence-based.
An attack on shooters will be seen as an attack on the countryside itself.
And as we provide clear evidence to support our case we will expect those who seek to restrict any aspect of shooting to do the same. They must back their claims with hard evidence, and this is particularly important in contentious areas such as the use of lead shot.
Let me make BASC’s position on lead totally clear: no sound evidence, no change.
Taken from – Shooting & Conservation May /June 2013 issue